Constitutional Reform Bill [Lords] — [3rd Allotted Day] — Schedule 3 — Transfer of appointment functions to her majesty — 1 Mar 2005 at 13:45
Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset voted in the minority (No).
I beg to move amendment No. 644, in page 63, line 6, leave out 'Supreme Court' and insert 'Senior Courts'.
Question put, That the amendment be made:-
Those voting Aye in this division agreed with the following statement.
The supreme court of England and Wales, as it is now known, is to be renamed the Senior Court of England and Wales, and the Supreme Court of Judicature of Northern Ireland will be renamed the Court of Judicature of Northern Ireland.
The Committee divided: Ayes 278, Noes 93.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||89 (+2 tell)||0||56.5%|
|Lab||248 (+2 tell)||0||0||61.3%|