Road Safety Bill — New Clause 21 — outlaws modifications to vehicles that could increase injury — 8 Mar 2005 at 17:29
George Osborne MP, Tatton voted with the majority (No).
Those voting Aye in this division wanted to modify the Road Traffic Act (1988) to prohibit...
"...the modification or retrofitting to the front of a motor vehicle any equipment which in the opinion of the Secretary of State may render the vehicle more likely to cause injury to a third party in the event of an accident."
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Lab||275 (+2 tell)||1||0||68.1%|
|LDem||0||33 (+2 tell)||0||63.6%|
|Peter Bottomley||Worthing West||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Mr Andrew Hunter||Basingstoke||whilst DUP||no|
|Paul Flynn||Newport West||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Martin Smyth||Belfast South||whilst UUP (front bench)||aye|