Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Clause — Review by Privy Council — 9 Mar 2005 at 19:34
Mr Mark Prisk MP, Hertford and Stortford voted in the minority (No).
The Aye-voters rejected a new Clause that was inserted after Clause 11 of the Prevention of Terrorism Bill that would have required the Act (which this Bill would eventually become) to be reviewed by a committee of five members of the Privy Council (senior parliamentarians) within eight months of it becoming law.
The actual text of this rejected Clause can be found under "Amendment No. 31" in the list of Lords' amendments.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||147 (+1 tell)||0||91.9%|
|Lab||341 (+2 tell)||22||0||89.5%|
|LDem||0||51 (+1 tell)||0||94.5%|