Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment — Rules of the Court — 9 Mar 2005 at 19:58
Mr Mark Hoban MP, Fareham voted in the minority (No).
The Aye-voters rejected the change made by the House of Lords to the Schedule of the Prevention of Terrorism Bill which would have removed three sub-paragraphs (see Amendment No. 38) and replaced them with:
The relevant rules of court shall be made by the Lord Chief Justice after consulting the Lord Chancellor.
(Unfortunately, I can't quite track down what those missing paragraphs said because there were further alternative amendments made by the Commons and the different versions of the Bill are not easy to track.)
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||146 (+1 tell)||0||91.3%|
|Lab||320 (+2 tell)||21||0||84.1%|
|LDem||0||51 (+1 tell)||0||94.5%|