Finance Bill — New Clause 1 — Inheritance Tax — 6 Jul 2005 at 13:30

Jamie Reed MP, Copeland voted with the majority (No).

The issue in this division was whether to put forward a new clause for the Finance Bill, which enacts the Budget provisions. The new clause was proposed by the Conservative front bench and would have lifted the requirements for administrators of estates which are not liable for Inheritance Tax to report to the Inland Revenue on the size of those estates.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con0 123 (+2 tell)063.8%
DUP0 6066.7%
Ind0 1050.0%
Lab276 (+2 tell) 0078.5%
LDem0 42068.9%
PC0 30100.0%
SNP0 5083.3%
UUP0 10100.0%
Total:276 181072.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive