Finance Bill — New Clause 4 — Tax Law Commission — 6 Jul 2005 at 14:45
David Ruffley MP, Bury St Edmunds did not vote.
The issue in this division was whether to put forward a new clause for the Finance Bill, which enacts the budget provisions. The new clause, which was proposed by the Conservative front bench, would have required the Treasury to set up a commission to examine the tax laws and report on how they could be simplified.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 139 (+2 tell) | 0 | 71.9% |
DUP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 280 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 79.7% |
LDem | 0 | 47 | 0 | 77.0% |
PC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
SNP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 289 | 194 | 0 | 76.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |