Racial and Religious Hatred Bill — Clause 1 — Hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds — 11 Jul 2005 at 20:45
Jamie Reed MP, Copeland voted with the majority (No).
Amendment proposed: No. 1, in page 1, line 3, of the Racial and Religious Hatred Bill, as introduced to parliment, leave out from 'Act' to end of line 7.-[Mr. Carmichael.]
Mr Evan Harris states that amendment No. 1 is a paving amendment for new schedule 1. As the act refers to only one schedule, I presume that amendment No. 1 also paves the way for amendment No. 2, which removes the original schedule.
The text of the new schedule 1 can be found in the speech given by the Deputy Speaker at the start of the debate.
The original schedule can be found in the Racial and Religious Hatred Bill, as introduced to parliment.
The House divided: Ayes 233, Noes 291. The Noes prevented the replacement of the schedule from taking place.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||156 (+1 tell)||0||80.1%|
|Lab||290 (+2 tell)||14||0||86.4%|
|LDem||0||54 (+1 tell)||0||90.2%|
|Colin Challen||Morley and Rothwell||Lab||aye|
|Katy Clark||North Ayrshire and Arran||Lab||aye|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||aye|
|Paul Flynn||Newport West||Lab||aye|
|Kelvin Hopkins||Luton North||Lab||aye|
|John McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab||aye|
|Alan Simpson||Nottingham South||Lab||aye|
|David Taylor||North West Leicestershire||Lab||aye|