Charities Bill [HL] — 12 Oct 2005 at 16:59

Lord Cobbold voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Clause 4 <[i>Guidance as to operation of public benefit requirement]:

moved Amendment No. 7:

Page 3, line 40, at end insert-

"( ) In carrying out consultation under subsection (4), the Commission shall, inter alia, consider the effect on public benefit of the charging policy of any charity."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 7) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 60; Not-Contents, 139

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con1 21.4%
Judge1 010.0%
Lab122 (+2 tell) 459.3%
LDem0 42 (+2 tell)59.5%
Crossbench13 1013.0%
Total:137 5828.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Vinson Conno
Lord Borrie Labaye
Baroness Turner of CamdenLabaye
Baroness Uddin Labaye
Baroness Warwick of UndercliffeLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive