Electoral Administration Bill — New Clause 1 — Registration of service personnel — 8 Nov 2005 at 19:15
John Prescott MP, Kingston upon Hull East did not vote.
I beg to move that the clause be read a Second time. [Hon. Members: "Hear, hear."] It is gratifying to hear such noises in the Committee; I have the sense that they may have come from more than one part of it.
The purpose of the clause is simple to explain. It is to restore the armed services personnel scheme that used to exist and to take the armed services back to the position they enjoyed prior to the 2000 Act. It will mean that at the next election all service personnel will be registered to vote.
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:-
The Committee divided: Ayes 217, Noes 288.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||157 (+2 tell)||0||81.1%|
|Lab||288 (+2 tell)||0||0||81.9%|