Ministerial Code — 15 Nov 2005 at 21:46
George Osborne MP, Tatton voted in the minority (Aye).
I beg to move,
That this House notes the recommendation made by the Committee on Standards in Public Life that there should be an independent Adviser on Ministerial Interests; and insists that the Government should immediately begin the process of establishing such a position.
I beg to move, To leave out from "House" to the end of the Question, and to add instead thereof:
"acknowledges that, amongst other measures, this Government introduced a requirement for individual Ministers, on appointment to each new office, to provide their Permanent Secretary with a full list in writing of all interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict; welcomes the section of the Ministerial Code on handling Ministers' private interests which is more comprehensive than Questions of Procedure for Ministers; and recognises that this Government has agreed to appoint an independent adviser to provide Permanent Secretaries and Ministers with an additional source of professional advice as required and will make an announcement on this shortly.".
Question put accordingly, That the original words stand part of the Question:-
The House divided: Ayes 229, Noes 288.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||163 (+2 tell)||0||84.2%|
|Lab||287 (+2 tell)||0||0||81.6%|