Climate Change — 22 Nov 2005 at 21:48
Lindsay Hoyle MP, Chorley did not vote.
Those voting No were against the original words of the motion for debate:
This House endorses the principle of a cross-party consensus on carbon reduction.
so they were changed to:
This House welcomes the leadership shown by the UK Government internationally on climate change, and the important progress made at the July Summit and at the recent meeting of the Dialogue on Climate Energy, Clean Energy and Sustainable Development; further welcomes the recent announcement of the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation and looks forward to the publication of the climate change programme review; recognises the importance of building greater understanding and support among all sectors of society for action on climate change; and further welcomes new ideas and contributions from all quarters that help to reduce carbon emissions.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 162 (+2 tell) | 0 | 83.7% |
DUP | 0 | 8 | 0 | 88.9% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 294 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 83.6% |
LDem | 0 | 52 | 0 | 83.9% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
SNP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 296 | 233 | 0 | 83.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |