National Insurance Contributions Bill — Clause 1 — Earnings: Power to Make Provision in Consequence of Retrospective Tax Legislation: Great Britain — 15 Dec 2005 at 15:15

Jamie Reed MP, Copeland voted with the majority (No).

I beg to move amendment No. 1, in page 1, line 13, after 'Treasury', insert

', following consultation with the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs,'.

Question put, That the amendment be made:-

The House divided: Ayes 44, Noes 237.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con0 12 (+2 tell)17.7%
DUP0 4044.4%
Lab234 (+2 tell) 0066.7%
LDem0 26041.9%
SDLP2 0066.7%
SNP0 1016.7%
Total:236 43145.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Ben WallaceLancaster and WyreConboth

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive