National Lottery Bill — New Clause 1 — Reports by distributing bodies — 19 Jan 2006 at 15:00
John Prescott MP, Kingston upon Hull East did not vote.
The no voters defeated an attempt to add a new clause to the bill. The new clause, had it been passed, would have required those who distributed the proceeds from the National Lottery to make a report each year about how the money had been spent. That report would have been made available to parliament.
From the debate, it appears that the reason that this clause was introduced was to prevent the goverment from using National Lottery money for projects that should have been funded from general taxation.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||131 (+1 tell)||0||67.3%|
|Lab||269 (+2 tell)||0||0||76.8%|
|LDem||0||40 (+1 tell)||0||66.1%|