[S2M-3922.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 8 Feb 2006 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S2M-3922.2
The description in the bulletin on 2006-02-08 is:
*S2M-3922.2 Mr John Swinney: Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2006—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3922) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, insert at end "but, in so doing, considers that, in order to protect council tax payers from above-inflation increases in council tax that will arise from the inadequate financial provision in this Order, local authorities should be permitted to retain £58.5 million in efficiency savings and obtain a £34.7m share of the public expenditure arising from the pre-Budget report to close the financial gap in support for local authority services that exists." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-3922.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-3922.2, in the name of John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3922, in the name of Tom McCabe, on the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2006, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 1 | 80.0% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 0 | 18 | 0 | 72.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 4 | 66.7% |
Total: | 79 | 27 | 5 | 86.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |