NHS Redress Bill [HL] — 15 Feb 2006 at 18:21

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

<[i>Amendment No. 26 not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 26A:

Page 3, line 40, at end insert-

"(2A) A scheme may make provision for access to an independent medico-legal expert agreeable both to the scheme authority and the person involved in the case which has been the subject of a report by the Patient Redress Investigator.

(2B) Both the scheme authority and the person involved in the case shall agree to be bound by the findings of the independent medico-legal expert."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 26A) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 90; Not-Contents, 121.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 4320.5%
Crossbench9 99.9%
Green0 1100.0%
Lab109 (+2 tell) 052.4%
LDem0 34 (+2 tell)48.6%
Total:118 8730.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive