NHS Redress Bill [HL] — 15 Feb 2006 at 18:21
Lord Kilclooney voted with the majority (Not-Content).
<[i>Amendment No. 26 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 26A:
Page 3, line 40, at end insert-
"(2A) A scheme may make provision for access to an independent medico-legal expert agreeable both to the scheme authority and the person involved in the case which has been the subject of a report by the Patient Redress Investigator.
(2B) Both the scheme authority and the person involved in the case shall agree to be bound by the findings of the independent medico-legal expert."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 26A) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 90; Not-Contents, 121.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 43 | 20.5% |
Crossbench | 9 | 9 | 9.9% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 109 (+2 tell) | 0 | 52.4% |
LDem | 0 | 34 (+2 tell) | 48.6% |
Total: | 118 | 87 | 30.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |