Compensation Bill [HL] — 7 Mar 2006 at 17:08
Lord Rix was absent
moved Amendment No. 5:
After Clause 1, insert the following new clause-
"INTERPRETATION OF PART 1
In considering for the purposes of this Part whether the defendant should have taken particular steps to meet a standard of care, a court shall have particular regard to whether the claimant-
(a) entered onto land or into premises with the intention of committing an offence, or
(b) otherwise willingly accepted a risk as his (the question whether a risk was so accepted to be decided on the same principles as in other cases in which one person owes a duty of care to another)."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 5) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 109; Not-Contents, 147.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 78 (+2 tell) | 38.1% |
Crossbench | 3 | 23 | 14.3% |
Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 140 (+2 tell) | 0 | 67.0% |
LDem | 0 | 1 | 1.4% |
Total: | 143 | 103 | 36.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Craig of Radley | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Elystan-Morgan | Crossbench | no |
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Slim | Crossbench (front bench) | no |