Identity Cards Bill — 20 Mar 2006 at 16:56

16 Clause 5, page 4, line 44, leave out "must" and insert "may, if the individual so chooses,"

22 Clause 8, page 7, line 42, leave out "must" and insert "may, if the individual so chooses,"

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments Nos. 16 and 22 but propose Amendments Nos. 22E and 22F in lieu.

22E Page 7, line 38, after "accompanies" insert "or includes"

22F Page 7, line 43, leave out from "manner" to the end and insert "ensure that an application to be issued with such a card accompanies or is included"

rose to move, as an amendment to Motion A, leave out from "disagreement" to end and insert "and do disagree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 22E and 22F in lieu, but do propose Amendments Nos. 22G and 22H in lieu-

22G Page 4, line 44, after "individual" insert "and is made on or before 31st December 2011, that application may, if the individual so chooses, include an application by that individual to be entered in the Register.

(2A) Where an application to be issued with a designated document is made by an individual and is made after 31st December 2011,"

22H Page 7, line 42, leave out from "card" to end of line 2 on page 8 and insert "may, if the individual so chooses, in the prescribed manner, include an application to be issued with such a card in any application made by him to be issued with a designated document, where that application is made on or before 31st December 2011.

(7A) An individual who is not already the holder of an ID card must, in the prescribed manner, include an application to be issued with such a card in any application made by him to be issued with a designated document, where that application is made after 31st December 2011.""

On Question, Whether the said Motion (A1) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 211; Not-Contents, 175.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop0 13.8%
Con123 (+1 tell) 059.3%
Crossbench25 1823.6%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab1 150 (+2 tell)72.2%
LDem55 (+1 tell) 075.7%
Total:206 16953.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bhatia Crossbenchno
Lord Birt Crossbenchno
Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchno
Lord Chorley Crossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Joffe Crossbenchno
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye
Lord Marsh Crossbenchno
Viscount Montgomery of AlameinCrossbenchno
Lord Ouseley Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Robertson of Port EllenCrossbenchno
Viscount Slim Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Tanlaw Crossbenchno
Viscount Tenby Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Turnbull Crossbenchno
Lord Walton of DetchantCrossbenchno
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Wright of RichmondCrossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive