Identity Cards Bill — 21 Mar 2006 at 17:45
George Osborne MP, Tatton voted in the minority (No).
I beg to move, That this House does not insist on its Amendments 22E and 22F but disagrees with the Lords in their Amendments 22G and 22H.
I should say, first, that I am very pleased that their lordships have now dropped their outright opposition to the designation power in the Bill by dropping their previous amendments Nos. 16 and 22. That is very good news and an important development. However, the amendments in lieu are not a real compromise as they would simply delay the power to link the issue of identity cards to designated documents, such as passports, until 2012. That is unacceptable and it would not be right to allow the other place to delay the implementation of legislation that it dislikes until five years have passed. That is a deliberate plan for delay and destruction of the process in the Identity Cards Bill.
The House having divided: Ayes 284, Noes 241.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||165 (+2 tell)||0||85.2%|
|Lab||283 (+2 tell)||9||0||83.3%|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||no|
|Mark Fisher||Stoke-on-Trent Central||Lab||no|
|Glenda Jackson||Hampstead and Highgate||Lab||no|
|John Martin McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab||no|
|Clare Short||Birmingham, Ladywood||whilst Lab||no|
|Gavin Strang||Edinburgh East||Lab||no|
|Robert Wareing||Liverpool, West Derby||whilst Lab||no|