Budget Resolutions 2006 — Abolish corporation tax starting rate — 28 Mar 2006 at 21:38

Dai Havard MP, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney voted with the majority (Aye).

The majority Aye voters agreed to abolish the corporation tax starting rate[1]. They also abolished a number of other measures relating to corporation tax.

Corporation Tax starting rate

Corporation tax is, very simply, a tax on profits made by companies resident in the UK. The starting rate for corporation tax was a measure introduced by Gordon Brown in his 1999 budget[2]. This meant companies who made a profit between £0 and £10,000 per year were taxed at 10% on those profits.

However, in the 2002 budget Gordon Brown reduced this starting rate to 0%[3] meaning, of course, companies with profits of no more than £10,000 paid no corporation tax.

Nevertheless, in the 2006 budget Brown decided to get rid of the starting rate entirely[4]. This meant companies with profits of between £0 and £10,000 would now be charged at the small companies' corporation tax rate which in 2006 was 19%[5]. Small companies corporation tax rate applies to companies whose profits do not exceed £300,000 per year.

Why scrap the starting rate?

This particular vote was on whether the corporation tax starting rate should be abolished. Labour wanted to scrap the starting rate because when it was set to 0% in 2002 this resulted in a large number of small businesses turning themselves into companies[6]. Consequently, many of these businesses were avoiding paying corporation tax.

In 2004 the Chancellor introduced a 'non-corporate distribution rate (NCDR)'[7] to try to recover more tax from businesses who were becoming companies (NCDR was also abolished in this vote). However, in the 2006 budget the government thought this was still a major issue and removed the starting rate entirely.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats both opposed these changes in corporation tax. Alan Duncan MP of the Tories explains as follows[8]:

  • 'the 0 per cent. rate has been abolished—the Institute for Fiscal Studies described that as an "unfortunate experience". The Chancellor made the bizarre claim in the Budget that that "simplification" would save business £9 million. Secondly, thresholds remain unchanged and have not even been uprated with inflation. We now have more corporation tax than Sweden.'

----

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con0 182 (+2 tell)093.9%
DUP0 7077.8%
Lab322 (+2 tell) 0091.8%
LDem0 61096.8%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP3 00100.0%
SNP0 5083.3%
UUP0 10100.0%
Total:325 259092.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive