Violent Crime Reduction Bill — revenue from alcohol disorder zones — 26 Apr 2006 at 19:10

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Amendment No. 62 not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 63:

Page 10, line 24, leave out "may" and insert "shall"
Amendment makes it mandatary rather than optional for any revenue from alcohol disorder zones to be used to address the problems caused by alcohol disorder.

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 63) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 73; Not-Contents, 96.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 31 (+2 tell)15.8%
Crossbench5 76.6%
Green0 1100.0%
Lab88 (+2 tell) 042.3%
LDem0 3243.2%
Total:93 7124.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bhatia Crossbenchno
Lord Dahrendorf Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive