Violent Crime Reduction Bill — revenue from alcohol disorder zones — 26 Apr 2006 at 19:10

Lord Grocott voted with the majority (Teller for the Not-Contents).

Amendment No. 62 not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 63:

Page 10, line 24, leave out "may" and insert "shall"
Amendment makes it mandatary rather than optional for any revenue from alcohol disorder zones to be used to address the problems caused by alcohol disorder.

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 63) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 73; Not-Contents, 96.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 31 (+2 tell)15.8%
Green0 1100.0%
Lab89 (+2 tell) 042.7%
LDem0 3243.2%
Crossbench5 76.7%
Total:94 7125.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive