Violent Crime Reduction Bill — revenue from alcohol disorder zones — 26 Apr 2006 at 19:10
Lord Grocott voted with the majority (Teller for the Not-Contents).
Amendment No. 62 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 63:
Page 10, line 24, leave out "may" and insert "shall"Amendment makes it mandatary rather than optional for any revenue from alcohol disorder zones to be used to address the problems caused by alcohol disorder.
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 63) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 73; Not-Contents, 96.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 31 (+2 tell) | 15.8% |
Crossbench | 5 | 7 | 6.6% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 88 (+2 tell) | 0 | 42.3% |
LDem | 0 | 32 | 43.2% |
Total: | 93 | 71 | 24.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bhatia | Crossbench | no |
Lord Dahrendorf | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Howarth of Breckland | Crossbench | no |
Lord Patel | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Williamson of Horton | Crossbench (front bench) | no |