[S2M-3866.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 4 May 2006 at 17:01

This looks like the vote on S2M-3866.2

The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-04 is:

*S2M-3866.2 Phil Gallie: Replacement of Trident—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3866) in the name of Chris Ballance, leave out from "that the United Kingdom" to end and insert "it essential that the United Kingdom should continue to play a full and effective role in the world and in NATO and that to do that requires the continuation of an effective defence capacity; notes that as long as other countries have nuclear weapons it is essential that Britain has the capacity to address that threat; supports the principle of replacing or updating the current Trident system with a successor generation nuclear deterrent when necessary; believes that there should be an objective of multilateral global nuclear disarmament, and further believes that, however, that objective can only safely be achieved by ensuring that no rogue dictatorships have the capacity to use nuclear weaponry unchallenged."

You can search for this motion (S2M-3866.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The next question is, that amendment S2M-3866.2, in the name of Phil Gallie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3866, in the name of Chris Ballance, on the replacement of Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |