[S2M-4317] Decision Time — 4 May 2006 at 17:01
Maureen Watt MP, North East Scotland voted with the majority (Aye).
This looks like the vote on S2M-4317
The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-03 is:
*S2M-4317 Cathy Jamieson: Police and Justice Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees that the UK Parliament should consider those provisions of the Police and Justice Bill, introduced in the House of Commons on 25 January 2006, which will legislate in devolved areas in respect of the abolition of the Police Information Technology Organisation and the establishment of the National Policing Improvement Agency and the Justice, Community Safety and Custody Inspectorate, and computer misuse, and which will alter the executive competence of the Scottish Ministers on extradition matters, as laid out in LCM(S2) 4.1. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S2M-4317) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is that motion S2M-4317, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Police and Justice Bill, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 20 | 0 | 0 | 80.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 101 | 6 | 7 | 89.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||