Company Law Reform Bill [HL] — 10 May 2006 at 18:57

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted in the minority (Not-Content).

Clause 444 <[i>Permitted disclosure of information obtained under compulsory powers]:

moved Amendment No. 272:

Page 207, line 23, leave out "following exceptions" and insert "provisions of this section"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 272) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 123; Not-Contents, 117.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con77 (+1 tell) 037.3%
Crossbench8 25.6%
Lab0 111 (+2 tell)53.1%
LDem33 (+1 tell) 045.9%
UUP0 1100.0%
Total:118 11434.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Kerr of KinlochardCrossbenchno
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive