[S2M-3961] Decision Time — 17 May 2006 at 17:31
This looks like the vote on S2M-3961
The description in the bulletin on 2006-02-20 is:
*S2M-3961 Mr Tom McCabe: Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill: Financial Resolution—That the Parliament, for the purposes of any Act of the Scottish Parliament resulting from the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill, agrees to any expenditure or increase in expenditure of a kind referred to in Rule 9.12.3(b)(iii) of the Parliament’s Standing Orders arising in consequence of the Act.
The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-15 is:
S2M-3961 Mr Tom McCabe: Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill: Financial Resolution—That the Parliament, for the purposes of any Act of the Scottish Parliament resulting from the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill, agrees to any expenditure or increase in expenditure of a kind referred to in Rule 9.12.3(b)(iii) of the Parliament’s Standing Orders arising in consequence of the Act. Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-3961) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-3961, in the name of Tom McCabe, on a financial resolution in respect of the Planning etc (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 2 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 90.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
Total: | 78 | 11 | 20 | 85.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |