Childcare Bill — 26 Jun 2006 at 15:44

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Clause 6 <[i>Duty to secure sufficient childcare for working parents]:

moved Amendment No. 2:

Page 4, line 22, at end insert-

"( ) must have regard to the quality of childcare provision and its suitability for the communities living in their area, and"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 2) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 117; Not-Contents, 121.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 6329.6%
Crossbench6 2114.8%
Green0 1100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab111 (+2 tell) 052.3%
LDem0 30 (+2 tell)40.5%
Total:118 11534.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Molyneaux of KilleadCrossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rees-Mogg Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Tanlaw Crossbenchno
Lord Turnbull Crossbenchno
Lord Weatherill Crossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive