Police and Justice Bill — 10 Oct 2006 at 16:04

Lord Tanlaw voted with the majority (Content).

Lords Division Number 1

Those voting in favour (the 'contents') were voting against Government plans to add punitive conditions to the existing scheme of cautions. This Government plans would introduce financial penalities and community payback punishments, e.g. removing graffiti, picking up litter.

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 207; Not-Contents, 145.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop3 012.0%
Con96 044.9%
DUP3 0100.0%
Green1 0100.0%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab0 138 (+2 tell)64.2%
LDem57 (+1 tell) 073.4%
Other1 012.5%
UUP1 033.3%
Crossbench42 (+1 tell) 626.2%
Total:205 14447.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive