Point of Order — Clause 3 — The "public benefit" test — 25 Oct 2006 at 17:45

Nick Herbert MP, Arundel and South Downs voted in the minority (Aye).

I beg to move amendment No. 126, in page 3, line 22, after 'not', insert

'save in the case of section 2(2)(c),'.

Question put, That the amendment be made:-

The House divided: Ayes 163, Noes 341.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con0 156 (+2 tell)080.6%
DUP0 6066.7%
Lab294 (+2 tell) 0084.1%
LDem47 1076.2%
Total:341 163081.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Alan BeithBerwick-upon-TweedLDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive