House of Lords Reform — Remove Hereditary Places — 7 Mar 2007 at 17:09
John Randall MP, Uxbridge voted in the minority (No).
The majority Ayes passed a motion which said that the remaining hereditary peers should be removed from the House of Lords.
-  Jack Straw MP, 7 March 2007, House of Commons
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||16||110 (+2 tell)||0||65.3%|
|Lab||305 (+2 tell)||0||0||87.2%|
|John Bercow||Buckingham||whilst Con||aye|
|Graham Brady||Altrincham and Sale West||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Greg Clark||Tunbridge Wells||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Derek Conway||Old Bexley and Sidcup||whilst Con||aye|
|Quentin Davies||Grantham and Stamford||whilst Con||aye|
|Mark Field||Cities of London and Westminster||Con||aye|
|Nick Herbert||Arundel and South Downs||Con (front bench)||aye|
|John Maples||Stratford-on-Avon||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Andrew Murrison||Westbury||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Andrew Pelling||Croydon Central||whilst Con||aye|
|John Stanley||Tonbridge and Malling||Con||aye|