Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007 — 28 Mar 2007 at 18:37
Viscount Tenby voted with the majority (Content).
Moved, That the draft order laid before the House on 1 March be approved. 12th Report from the Statutory Instruments Committee and 13th and 16th Reports from the Merits Committee.-(Lord Davies of Oldham.)
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion, to leave out all the words after "that" and insert "this House, taking account of the 13th Report from the Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee, declines to approve the draft order; considers it desirable that Lords be appointed to join with a committee of the Commons as a Joint Committee to consider the process by which a decision was reached on which licensing authority should issue the regional casino premises licence and to report by 1 June 2007; and calls upon Her Majesty's Government to take account of the recommendations of any such Joint Committee and to lay regulations including the licensing authorities as set out in the draft order whose responsibility it is to issue the eight large and eight small casino premises licences."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 1) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 123; Not-Contents, 120.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 3 | 0 | 11.5% |
Con | 30 | 7 | 17.8% |
Crossbench | 27 | 8 | 18.5% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 11 | 101 (+2 tell) | 52.8% |
LDem | 48 (+2 tell) | 0 | 63.3% |
Total: | 121 | 116 | 33.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Denham | Con | no |
Lord Norton of Louth | Con (front bench) | no |
The Earl of Onslow | Con (front bench) | no |
Lord Patten | Con | no |
Lord Ryder of Wensum | Con | no |
Lord Soulsby of Swaffham Prior | Con (front bench) | no |
Lord Wolfson | Con | no |
Lord Armstrong of Ilminster | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Viscount Colville of Culross | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness D'Souza | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Hannay of Chiswick | Crossbench | no |
Lord Jay of Ewelme | Crossbench | no |
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen | Crossbench | no |
The Earl of Sandwich | Crossbench | no |
Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington | Crossbench | no |
Lord Williamson of Horton | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Acton | Lab | aye |
Lord Ahmed | Lab | aye |
Lord Alli | Lab | aye |
Lord Faulkner of Worcester | Lab (minister) | aye |
Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws | Lab | aye |
Lord Mitchell | Lab | aye |
Lord Morgan | Lab | aye |
Lord Parekh | Lab | aye |
Lord Patel of Blackburn | Lab | aye |
Lord Rea | Lab (minister) | aye |
Baroness Rendell of Babergh | Lab (minister) | aye |