Serious Crime Bill [HL] — 25 Apr 2007 at 18:40

moved AmendmentNo. 37:

Clause 33, page 22, line 19, at end insert-
"(3) Notwithstanding this, the rules on admissibility of evidence to be observed in such proceedings shall be the same as those observed in trials on indictment; and no person shall be required in such proceedings to answer any question or to produce any document which he could not be required to answer or produce in similar proceedings in a trial on indictment."

On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. 37) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 43; Not-Contents, 115.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con1 11.0%
Crossbench4 23.2%
Green0 1100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Lab104 (+2 tell) 049.1%
LDem0 36 (+2 tell)48.1%
UUP1 0100.0%
Total:110 4122.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Lloyd of BerwickCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Walpole Crossbench (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive