Orders of the Day — Clause 67 — Abolition of contributions relief for life assurance premium contributions — 1 May 2007 at 18:00

Philip Dunne MP, Ludlow voted in the minority (No).

I beg to move, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

Question put, That the clause stand part of the Bill:-

The Committee divided: Ayes 262, Noes 145.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con0 120 (+2 tell)062.2%
DUP0 2022.2%
Ind1 10100.0%
Lab261 (+2 tell) 0074.7%
LDem0 19030.2%
PC0 1033.3%
SNP0 2033.3%
UUP0 10100.0%
Total:262 146065.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive