Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill — custody — 25 Jun 2007 at 18:09
Lord Ramsbotham voted with the majority (Teller for the Contents).
This motion is whether the House of Lords insists on it's amendment rather than the Commons amendment. The effect of the the Lords amendment is to include all those in custody within the terms of the Bill, whereas the Commons wishes to omit this provision. Those voting not-content wish to side with the Comons in leaving custody issues out of the Bill. Thoe voting Content wish to include custody in the Bill.
On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. A1) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 183; Not-Contents, 145.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 0 | 3.8% |
| Con | 97 (+1 tell) | 0 | 46.9% |
| Ind Lab | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 1 | 140 (+2 tell) | 66.5% |
| LDem | 58 | 0 | 73.4% |
| Other | 2 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Crossbench | 21 (+1 tell) | 3 | 13.2% |
| Total: | 181 | 143 | 45.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Morris of Handsworth | Lab | aye |