Children Act 2004 Information Database (England) Regulations 2007 — 18 Jul 2007 at 21:11

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion in the name of Lord Adonis, at end to insert "but this House regrets that the cost is likely to be disproportionate to the benefit and could have been more effectively and safely spent on professional staff".

On Question, Whether the said amendment shall be agreed to?

*Their Lordships divided: Contents, 38; Not-Contents, 77.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 19 (+1 tell)9.6%
Crossbench1 21.6%
Lab71 (+2 tell) 033.0%
LDem0 15 (+1 tell)20.3%
UUP0 1100.0%
Total:72 3716.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Joffe Crossbenchno
Lord Robertson of Port EllenCrossbenchno
Lord Wedderburn of CharltonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive