[S3M-679] Decision Time — 25 Oct 2007 at 17:06
Angela Constance MP, Livingston did not vote.
This looks like the vote on S3M-679
The description in the bulletin on 2007-10-24 is:
*S3M-679 Mary Scanlon: Free Personal Care—That the Parliament notes with concern that the interpretation, implementation and funding of the Community Care and Health (Scotland) Act 2002 has been beset by difficulties, many of which remain unresolved; believes that the decision of Lord Macphail on the Petition of Argyll & Bute Council dated 17 October 2007 is contrary to the intention of the Parliament, and calls on the Scottish Government to assure all people over 65 currently resident in independent care homes who have been assessed as eligible for free personal care, and others who may be assessed in future as so eligible, that councils will continue to fund their personal care regardless of whether or not there is a contract to which a council is a party.
You can search for this motion (S3M-679) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S3M-679, in the name of Mary Scanlon, on free personal care, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 46 | 0 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 46 | 0 | 0 | 97.9% |
| Total: | 64 | 61 | 0 | 98.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||