[S3M-788.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 8 Nov 2007 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-788.2
The description in the bulletin on 2007-11-08 is:
*S3M-788.2 Tavish Scott: Holding the SNP Government to Account—As an amendment to motion (S3M-788) in the name of Jackie Baillie, insert at end "further recognises that no one party has a majority in the Parliament and, therefore, requires that the Scottish Government commits to enhancing the existing arrangements to provide early access to the civil service to support the Finance Committee and opposition parties wishing to pursue recommendations for amendments to the budget to ensure that they are fully aware of the consequences of any change proposed to the budget."
You can search for this motion (S3M-788.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S3M-788.2, in the name of Tavish Scott, which seeks to amend motion S3M-788, in the name of Jackie Baillie, on holding the SNP Government to account, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 44 | 0 | 95.7% |
LDem | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 45 | 0 | 0 | 95.7% |
Total: | 63 | 59 | 1 | 96.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |