[S3M-1105] Decision Time — 10 Jan 2008 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S3M-1105
The description in the bulletin on 2008-01-09 is:
*S3M-1105 Iain Gray: Spending Review 2007—That the Parliament regrets the difficulties faced by subject committees in scrutinising the Spending Review 2007 due to the failure of the Scottish Government to provide figures to the level of detail established in previous budget consideration; notes the widely expressed concerns that provision in some areas is inadequate or rendered vulnerable through immediate removal of ring-fencing, and calls on the Scottish Government to work with the Parliament’s committees in their detailed consideration of these areas and, as a starting point, amend its spending review proposals to boost economic growth and protect the most vulnerable in our society.
You can search for this motion (S3M-1105) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S3M-1105, in the name of Iain Gray, on the spending review 2007, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 44 | 0 | 95.7% |
LDem | 0 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 46 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 63 | 61 | 1 | 97.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Angela Constance | Livingston | SNP | no |