Lisbon Treaty — Amendment to proposed Commons timetable for debate — rejected — 28 Jan 2008 at 21:45
Karen Buck MP, Regent's Park and Kensington North voted with the majority (No).
The programme motion restricted the Commons to a set timetable for debating the European Union (Amendment) Bill, which implements the Lisbon Treaty. The amendment would have increased the number of days allotted for the debate, and increased the proportion of each day spent debating amendments to the bill.
Consequently, the amendment was intended to delay the passing of the European Union (Amendment) Bill.
-  William Hague MP, House of Commons, 28 January 2008
-  Jim Murphy MP, House of Commons, 28 January 2008
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||173 (+2 tell)||0||90.2%|
|Lab||303 (+2 tell)||7||0||88.6%|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||aye|
|Ian Davidson||Glasgow South West||Lab||aye|
|Roger Godsiff||Birmingham, Sparkbrook and Small Heath||Lab||aye|
|Kelvin Hopkins||Luton North||Lab||aye|
|Graham Stringer||Manchester, Blackley||Lab||aye|