Banking (Special Provisions) Bill — Third Reading — 19 Feb 2008 at 23:56
Stewart Jackson MP, Peterborough voted in the minority (No).
The majority voted for a Third Reading to the Banking (Special Provisions) Bill,[1] the purpose of which was to nationalize the failed mortgage company Northern Rock.
The debate leading up to this vote was about accepting or rejecting the entire Bill as it stood.[2]
The debate was cut off at midnight according to the timetable[3] voted on at the start of the start of the proceedings.[4]
- [1] Banking (Special Provisions) Bill
- [2] Third Reading debate, House of Commons, 19 February 2008.
- [3] Yvette Cooper MP (Chief Secretary, HM Treasury), 19 February 2008.
- [4] Division 80, House of Commons, 19 February 2008.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 161 (+2 tell) | 0 | 84.5% |
DUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 55.6% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20.0% |
Lab | 287 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 82.1% |
LDem | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6.3% |
SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
Total: | 292 | 166 | 1 | 74.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Bob Russell | Colchester | LDem (front bench) | both |