Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill — 26 Feb 2008 at 21:14
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted with the majority (Teller for the Not-Contents).
Clause 20 <[i>Consecutive terms of imprisonment]:
moved Amendment No. 91:
Clause 20, leave out Clause 20 and insert the following new Clause-
"Consecutive terms of imprisonment: maximum duration etc.
(1) Section 181 (prison sentences of less than 12 months) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44) is amended as follows.
(2) For subsection (7) substitute-
"(6A) Where a court imposes two or more terms of imprisonment in accordance with this section to be served consecutively, the court shall have complete discretion to set the aggregate length of the terms of imprisonment subject to a maximum of 65 weeks and may suspend all or part of the total period of imprisonment.""
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 91) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 31; Not-Contents, 32.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Contents | Not-Contents | Turnout |
Con | 22 (+2 tell) | 0 | 11.7% |
Crossbench | 6 | 1 | 3.7% |
DUP | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 0 | 27 (+2 tell) | 13.1% |
LDem | 0 | 1 | 1.3% |
Total: | 29 | 29 | 8.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Patel | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Patel of Bradford | Crossbench | no |