[S3M-2779.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 30 Oct 2008 at 17:00
Lord George [Missing last name for 80312] MP, Lothians voted with the majority (No).
This looks like the vote on S3M-2779.2
The description in the bulletin on 2008-10-30 is:
*S3M-2779.2 Patrick Harvie: The Importance of HBOS to the Scottish Economy and Jobs—As an amendment to motion (S3M-2779) in the name of Tavish Scott, leave out from "gives" to end and insert "recognises the need for short-term action by the United Kingdom and other governments to tackle the current banking crisis; rejects, however, any effort simply to refloat the failed model of deregulated financial services, which has been supported by Labour and Conservative UK governments and by Labour/Liberal Democrat and SNP administrations in Scotland; calls on the UK and Scottish governments to commit to a future for the financial services sector that is based on sustainability and self-reliance rather than the impossible objective of limitless economic growth fuelled by reckless lending and excessive leverage, and, in the short term, demands that an element of democratic control be exercised over the lending and investment activity of banks that have been bailed out by taxpayers’ money to ensure that economic, social and environmental sustainability are prioritised through that activity." Supported by: Robin Harper*
You can search for this motion (S3M-2779.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S3M-2779.2, in the name of Patrick Harvie, which seeks to amend motion S3M-2779, in the name of Tavish Scott, on the importance of HBOS to the Scottish economy and jobs, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 24 | 0 | 0 | 52.2% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 45 | 0 | 0 | 95.7% |
Total: | 100 | 3 | 0 | 80.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |