Counter-Terrorism Bill — Post-charge questioning: England and Wales — 4 Nov 2008 at 18:42

Baroness Warsi was Content.

Clause 23 <[i>Post-charge questioning: England and Wales]:

moved Amendment No. 6:

Clause 23, page 16, line 33, leave out subsections (2) to (5) and insert-
"( ) A judge of the Crown Court may authorise the questioning of a person about an offence-

(a) after the person has been charged with the offence or been officially informed that they may be prosecuted for it, or(b) after the person has been sent for trial for the offence,if the offence is a terrorism offence or it appears to the judge that the offence has a terrorist connection.

( ) The judge-

(a) must specify the period during which questioning is authorised, and(b) may impose such conditions as appear to be necessary in the interests of justice, which may include conditions as to the place where the questioning is to be carried out.

( ) The period during which questioning is authorised-

(a) begins when questioning pursuant to the authorisation begins and runs continuously from that time (whether or not questioning continues), and(b) must not exceed 48 hours.

This is without prejudice to any application for a further authorisation under this section.
( ) Where the person is in prison or otherwise lawfully detained, the judge may authorise the person's removal to another place and detention there for the purpose of being questioned.
( ) A judge must not authorise the questioning of a person under this section unless satisfied-

(a) that further questioning of the person is necessary in the interests of justice,(b) that the investigation for the purposes of which the further questioning is proposed is being conducted diligently and expeditiously, and(c) that what is authorised will not interfere unduly with the preparation of the person's defence to the charge in question or any other criminal charge."

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 6, Amendment No. 7:

Clause 23, line 13, after "to" insert-

"(i)"

On Question, Whether Amendment No. 7, as an amendment to Amendment No. 6, shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 130; Not-Contents, 130.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyContentsNot-ContentsTurnout
Con72 (+1 tell) 035.8%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab1 117 (+2 tell)55.3%
LDem33 043.4%
UUP2 066.7%
Crossbench19 (+1 tell) 1116.2%
Total:128 12837.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive