Planning Bill — 18 Nov 2008 at 18:11
Lord Rees of Ludlow voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Resolved in the negative, and Motion disagreed to accordingly.
<[i>Amendments Nos. 17 to 20 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 21:
Clause 209, page 121, line 39, leave out "(1) or"
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 21) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 89; Not-Contents, 138.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 (+1 tell) | 7.4% |
Crossbench | 8 | 25 | 17.2% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 124 (+2 tell) | 0 | 57.8% |
LDem | 0 | 45 (+1 tell) | 60.5% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Total: | 133 | 85 | 32.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bew | Crossbench | no |
Lord Boston of Faversham | Crossbench | no |
Lord Crisp | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Elystan-Morgan | Crossbench | no |
Lord Joffe | Crossbench | no |
Lord Pannick | Crossbench | no |
Lord Patel | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Patel of Bradford | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Rees of Ludlow | Crossbench | no |
Lord Sutherland of Houndwood | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | Crossbench | no |