[S3M-3214.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 15 Jan 2009 at 17:00
Angela Constance MP, Livingston voted with the majority (No).
This looks like the vote on S3M-3214.4
The description in the bulletin on 2009-01-15 is:
*S3M-3214.4 Jeremy Purvis: Forth Crossing—As an amendment to motion (S3M-3214) in the name of John Swinney, leave out from "and welcomes" to end and insert "; condemns the actions of the Scottish Government in bringing before the Parliament a proposal for the Forth Replacement Crossing (FRC) that has no agreed funding package; notes that under the Scottish Government’s plans "a significant number of other very deserving capital projects will have to be displaced to make room for the FRC", and therefore calls on the Scottish Government to bring before the Parliament immediately a prioritised list of capital projects between 2009 and 2016."
You can search for this motion (S3M-3214.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-3214.4, in the name of Jeremy Purvis, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3214, in the name of John Swinney, on the Forth crossing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 41 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 0 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 66 | 57 | 0 | 96.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |