[S3M-3257.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 22 Jan 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-3257.3
The description in the bulletin on 2009-01-22 is:
*S3M-3257.3 Alison McInnes: Scottish Government’s Response to the Scottish Council of Economic Advisers’ Annual Report—As an amendment to motion (S3M-3257) in the name of Fiona Hyslop, insert at end "notes the Council of Economic Advisers’ recommendation that the Scottish Government "raises the overall level of infrastructure spending within Scotland", and believes that the Elgin bypass should be included in the Scottish Government’s transport infrastructure investment plans." Supported by: Jeremy Purvis* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S3M-3257.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-3257.3, in the name of Alison McInnes, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3257, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, on the Scottish Government's response to the annual report of the Scottish Council of Economic Advisers, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 0 | 36 | 78.3% |
LDem | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 46 | 0 | 0 | 97.9% |
Total: | 48 | 15 | 52 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |