Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL] — Committee (5th Day) (Continued) — 23 Feb 2009 at 21:37

Lord Bassam of Brighton voted with the majority (Teller for the Not-Contents).

Clause 64: Applications

Amendment 101ZA

Moved by Lord Tyler

101ZA: Clause 64, page 36, line 36, leave out "or expedient"

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 12 (+2 tell)6.9%
Lab30 (+2 tell) 014.7%
LDem6 07.9%
Other1 016.7%
UUP0 133.3%
Crossbench3 12.1%
Total:40 148.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive