Control Orders — Annual renewal 2009 — Declines to approve — rejected — 5 Mar 2009 at 12:45
Lord Dixon voted with the majority (Not-Content).
The majority of Lords voted in favour of renewing[1] the Control order powers brought in by the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 for yet another year.[2]
- [1] The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in force of sections 1 to 9) Order 2009, Statutory Instrument.
- [2] Lord West of Spithead, House of Lords, 5 March 2009
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 1 | 1 | 1.0% |
Crossbench | 29 | 9 | 19.8% |
Lab | 99 (+1 tell) | 0 | 45.9% |
LDem | 0 | 36 (+2 tell) | 50.7% |
UKIP | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 130 | 46 | 26.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Alton of Liverpool | Crossbench | aye |
The Earl of Erroll | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Howe of Idlicote | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
Lord Hylton | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Masham of Ilton | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Murphy | Crossbench | aye |
The Earl of Sandwich | Crossbench | aye |
Baroness Stern | Crossbench | aye |
Lord Walpole | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |