[S3M-3542] Decision Time — 11 Mar 2009 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S3M-3542
The description in the bulletin on 2009-02-26 is:
*S3M-3542 Fergus Ewing: Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Kenny MacAskill*
The description in the bulletin on 2009-03-02 is:
S3M-3542 Fergus Ewing: Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Kenny MacAskill
The description in the bulletin on 2009-03-09 is:
S3M-3542 Fergus Ewing: Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Kenny MacAskill
You can search for this motion (S3M-3542) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S3M-3542, in the name of Fergus Ewing, on the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Lab | 40 | 0 | 0 | 87.0% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 44 | 0 | 0 | 93.6% |
| Total: | 98 | 16 | 0 | 89.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote