[S3M-3542] Decision Time — 11 Mar 2009 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S3M-3542
The description in the bulletin on 2009-02-26 is:
*S3M-3542 Fergus Ewing: Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Kenny MacAskill*
The description in the bulletin on 2009-03-02 is:
S3M-3542 Fergus Ewing: Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Kenny MacAskill
The description in the bulletin on 2009-03-09 is:
S3M-3542 Fergus Ewing: Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Kenny MacAskill
You can search for this motion (S3M-3542) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S3M-3542, in the name of Fergus Ewing, on the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote